(June 2, 2016 at 10:55 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: The gorilla wasn't an immediate threat to the kid. The zoo personnel could have safely extracted the kid from the enclosure without any injury to the gorilla or to the kid or to themselves. If the kid had been in with chimps chances are the chimps would have quickly killed him because chimps are naturally more vicious than gorillas. They will attack and kill very quickly.Well, we all know your expertise garnered from your mom's basement as a result of watching a grainy YouTube video should be trusted over the animal experts and DART team on site. I don't know why we didn't ask you first.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
