I need help with refutations for this

[reverendjeremiah]

The first is an argument that theism can be rational without knowledge of a good argument for theism;

LMFAO.. So you think Islam and Hinduism and Satanism and Asatru and Helenism, and Chinese traditional all are rational without a need for a good argument?

the second is normally called the "Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism" (EAAN) which argues that the conjunction of evolution and naturalism is self-defeating.

..and you think that evolution, the pride of naturalism, argues against naturalism?

So theism doesnt HAVE to have a good argument to be rational, and naturalist evidence points against naturalism?



Holy shit man..you just brightened up my easter day