Curious to know

[Redbeard The Pink]

Brain dead my arse:

Brain Dead?

Prikky, these people know nothing right?  What is this?  Is it a conspiracy to stop your world view?

Please Prikky, how do we explain this away?  We need your help

Didn't I say that LR give free tuition?
Here I am.


There are enough experiences to knock down your theory.
Let us talk about just one experience but there are many more.

One of this experience was about one person that after he or she die (I forgot about the sex)
in the emergency room of the hospital saw what was happening inside the hospital.
He or she saw a nurse that drop a baby on the floor.
The baby had a fracture and was crying for the pain but the nurse was not ready to accept the responsibility so she put the baby in the cot and moved on as nothing happened.
When the person who had the NDE and saw what happened from above (so to speak) came back to life
he or she inform the doctors who brought him-her back to life of the incident so the baby with the fracture could be look after.

Now you tell me how could the brain see what happen inside the hospital?
The brain doesn't but the consciousness can therefore it was the consciousness that took over once the brain was gone.  

Simple. It can't. That story isn't true.


Let's say it were, though. Somebody in a hospital has a dream about a dropped baby, and then it turns out that a baby turned up injured in the natal ward. There are any number of plausible, natural explanations that you'd have to parse out with Occam's Razor before moving on to "death magic."


First off, did they ever establish that the real-world baby was actually dropped by a nurse? What if the patient dreamed of a dropped baby, but the actual baby was injured by thrashing around in its crib or during its exit from the womb? That would make it seem like a coincidence, right?


Furthermore, what if the person who had the experience saw the natal ward, noticed one baby crying more than the others, didn't think anything of it at the time, but later had this dream out of unresolved concern for the crying baby?


These are the kinds of things you would need to be able to rule out before even trying to jump to your conclusion, and it doesn't sound like you have enough details to do that. This is the exact reason why documented events in controlled conditions are evidence while testimony (especially second or third hand) is not. Not only is your story practically impossible to verify, but even if it were true it wouldn't be evidence for what you're asserting because there isn't enough information here to suss out what actually happened, let alone why.