(June 26, 2016 at 9:25 am)Little Rik Wrote: Garbage son.
Doctors declare the bloke dead before their NDE but you guys think that the bloke didn't die for real.
These are ............non biased sourceS......but you guys are a bunch of hypocrites to say that you only believe in non biased sources and then when doctors that are these type of valid non biased sources tell you that the bloke die for real you do not believe that.
What crap are you talking about?
In that case it wouldn't be called a NEAR death experience.
What part of near do you not understand? Aren't you the one who on several occasions use the literal definition of something? Tell me, why do you turn a blind eye to the near part of the death experience?
Also you still haven't presented a valid source. I'm not talking about what the fuck the doctor said I'm talking about a valid source, a peer fucking reviewed source, a damn source with good reputition, a source that has done good to the scientific community. Not some fucking Dr Sam Fucktard, alright? Do you now know what a valid source is? I was taught how to declare a source valid in elementary school, you're an adult and you don't know what the fuck a valid source is?
