(June 27, 2016 at 10:54 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote:Rationalwiki Wrote:The scientific consensus says that there are no generic health risks common for all GMFs.[53][54] Any possible harm can only come from a specific engineered trait. This view is shared by the World Health Organization,[55] the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the European Food Safety Agency, the International Council for Science,[56] the U.S. National Academies of Science,[57] and almost all national scientific bodies. According to one metastudy which included 12 long-term studies and 12 multigenerational studies: "The studies reviewed present evidence to show that GM plants are nutritionally equivalent to their non-GM counterparts and can be safely used in food and feed."[58]
Scientists with anti-GMF positions are a tiny minority of researchers, many of them with ideological and/or financial conflicts of interest
My emphasis.
OK...not really the argument, but, OK.....
You may refer to me as "Oh High One."