RE: Muslim Imam calls for Homosexual death 3 weeks before pulse nigh club shooting
July 2, 2016 at 7:23 am
(This post was last modified: July 2, 2016 at 7:40 am by Athene.)
(June 30, 2016 at 1:08 pm)Drich Wrote:(June 29, 2016 at 10:20 pm)Thena323 Wrote: What...are you crazy? How is this video even relevant?
The Orlando attack had NOTHING to do with homosexuality...so sayeth you.
quotation please.
Well, there's no way I'm going to wade through piles of posts stretching over 3 or more thread. So, fine...I'll rephrase:
You believe the massacre was a punishment towards the West for attacking the perpetrator's homeland, and that the choice of venue was simply a means for the perpetrator to atone for his homosexual urges/sin; nothing more. The fact that the LGBT community would use this act of terror to push their douchey, liberal agenda is shameful.
Better now?
I was just wondering why you would suddenly be concerned with the matter, if not pushing an agenda of your own.
Irony man, irony.
Get it?
Quote:So not news...
A main stream mosque invites a main stream imam to speak and he speaks a mainstream Islamic message that says Kill Gay people so they can have a chance at attonement... Then 3 weeks later someone struggling with his homosexuality does this very thing!
Of course it would be news if there were an indication that the attacker actually heard this Imam's particular message. Did he?
If that's the case, I'd agree that this video should've seen more airtime, as it would be reasonable to suggest it was a possible and/or likely motivation for the shooter's actions. Otherwise it's just one of many hate-filled diatribes aimed at the wicked, wicked West.
Disturbing, yes....but by no means shocking or unusual, IMO.
Quote:Maybe you should take some time to define what is and is not news worthy to your liberal mind..
Perhaps you should tone down the hysteria and quasi- conspspiracy theorism, and resist suggesting that people are stupid or deficient because they don't immediately accept your suppositions as facts and subsequently conclude that some sort of hidden/shadow agenda is at play.
Quote:Better yet would it be news if he were following the instructions of a west borough baptist minister instead? Why is one news and the other not? Why was the mere fact that they were here protesting the funerals with their god hates fag signs and the guy who inspired the shootings gets a pass?
Or have you just been indoctrinated to not think that way?
Nope. My anti-indoctrination software's been recently updated.
Not sure why you would actually suggest that, without actually being clear on my thoughts regarding the matter. The leaps and bounds you're willing to take when making assumptions about people is astonishing, Drich. I've never seen anything quite like it.
Quote:Thena wrote:
Quote:who's safty? the murder who instigated this attack? Because without some public accountability his guy is free to continue to perfect his sermon to reach out to the next guy and the next.
heh heh...Last I heard it wasn't douchebag liberals who wanted to block any attempts at limiting hate-speech as being an attacks on religious expression.
Can't have it both ways, sir.
Quote:Or maybe you are referring to the billions who embrace what was said on the video???
What if they were Christians who said this and billions of Christian who embraced a doctrine of killing gays would you be concerned with their safty?
No, Drich. I'm referring to the safety of ordinary American citizens, including those who just happen be, or are even perceived as being Muslim.
Quote:Why the hypocrisy?
There's no hypocrisy. I'm actually of the opinion that radical Islam currently poses a greater security threat to the U.S. and U.S. interests than radical Christianity; I'm simply capable of recognizing the clear distinction between that, and the assertion that all or "most Muslims" are a security threat.
An important distinction...particularly when it comes to determining just what in the Hell's to be done about it, don't you think?
