(July 6, 2016 at 8:27 am)Little Rik Wrote:(July 5, 2016 at 10:52 am)Crossless1 Wrote: No, dumbass, biological evolution is about heritable changes in populations -- it is not about individuals. Epic fail, as usual with you. I can't say I'm surprised though.
Imbecile.
Put it in this way.
50 years ago people watched black&white tv.
Today they watch color tv.
This is a change in people culture so to speak.
We got a myriad of similar changes.
People change their way to do thing so in a way it is a biological evolution but wait a minute Cross.
Do these changes really lead to a progress in conscious evolution?
Of course they don't that is why the word evolution should only be used when a change for the better in
the consciousness occur.
All the rest means absolutely nothing even if some idiots in the past reckon that changes in people culture means progress.
The same goes for changes in technologies.
They are just changes which do not necessary mean progress.
Today we have the fridge to keep food longer.
In the past they didn't but the food taste good and was devoid of chemicals and preservative.
So there is a change for the better and one for the worse.
In other words there is no progress and evolution means nothing.
Evolution can only be within but this is an argument too difficult to understand
for dreamer like you.
Have a good day anyway.
Listen, you blithering idiot, you really need to stop using the word evolution, unless you're addressing biological evolution. There are perfectly good synonyms for the word if you insist on rambling about technological change, cultural change, individual enlightenment, etc.
As it is, my post was in response to your continuing to conflate one with the other. Most people over the age of eight would understand the distinction.
