What would you consider to be evidence for God?

[Pat Mustard]

Evolution is not solely about genetics. Ever hear about epigenetics, the study of evolutionary change which isn't based on DNA molecules? We've known for years that DNA is subject to radical mutation (one of the main vectors of genetic evolution, the other being reproductive recombination), and we've also known for years that there are defences against mutation in this way(some genetic, some non genetic). And we also know that some strands of DNA code for proteins in different shape, radically altering their purpose, depending on the stressors affecting a body.

Despite what your peabrain thinks, you are pointing to research which strengthens evolution, not destroys it.

Epigenetics adds another layer of complexity since information for 3-dimensional form and structure of an animal is stored in the cell structure itself. Complexity and more information (comes from a mind, that’s why SETI is looking for information and not random noise) doesn’t argue for a mindless, undirected explanation.
Now, continuing with DNA: the 3 Nobel Laureates discovered after decades of research of mapping at the molecular level that the DNA has 3 molecular systems which constantly monitor the genome and repair any damage.
1. Base Excision Repair - if an amino group is lost and becomes unable to form a base pair, thus breaking the DNA chain an enzyme detects the error, and other enzymes repair it so that the DNA can replicate properly.
2. Nucleotide Excision Repair - through this mechanism, enzymes will cut out (yes cut out), remove, and replace a damaged DNA strand.
3. Mismatch Repair - replication errors often occur as the DNA is copied but enzymes continually detect most of these errors, and other enzymes repair the damaged DNA.*

What this research shows is that for abiogenesis to occur, undirected, random processes must have anticipated the inherent instability of DNA and assembled the cell with the variety of enzymes necessary to prevent the self-destruction of DNA.

*http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/c...ze2015.pdf

No snowtracks, what it shows, again, is that you haven't one fucking clue about what you're pontificating on, and that you simply twist every bit of evidence to fit the lie you convinced yourself to believe.