(July 9, 2016 at 6:33 am)Little Rik Wrote:(July 8, 2016 at 6:13 am)robvalue Wrote: I just told you what proper science is. Peer review. Not making stuff up on your own.
Have you submitted anything for peer review Rik, ever?
If you're going to try and count posting on here as peer review, you've utterly failed in every possible way. There aren't even any results to look at, for a start.
Roberto.
Gee, I am so excited that an expert in science like you is here.
Look Rob, I always try to understand why the time differ so much among people and
in between good and bad time.
When People are happy the time goes very fast but when people suffer the time goes so slow.
Not only that but the conventional time dictated by our watch doesn't even follow good or bad time.
Please Roberto explain to me how science reconcile all this?
While this is an interesting question of psychology, why would you even think that it represents a problem for science in need of reconciliation? It doesn't. The brain is an imperfect "physical time" keeping device. That's neither controversial nor hard to explain.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
