(July 17, 2016 at 1:35 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:(July 17, 2016 at 6:24 am)Little Rik Wrote: Yog, I could go on and on with all the garbage-guessing that you guys spout day after day which could be
thrown in the garbage bin by an independent jury.
Get real yog.
Back to this conspiracy theory crap. I've explained that what matters is not the fault with the other guy's beliefs, but rather the evidence you bring for your own.
Whoooooooo, that is incredible yog.
You are saying that in a forum is ok. for somebody to spout crap after crap but not for someone in particular.
You reach a new high of stupidity.
Quote:I've asked you for evidence before and you never provide it. You just ramble on with a bunch of analogies or bare assertions. If you cannot provide evidence for what you believe, then you aren't worth listening to. So far the only evidence for anything you believe has been a handful of NDEs. That's not evidence for karma or microvita or reincarnation, yet you continue to babble on anyway. You're just full of crap because all you do is spew about the other guy. I've given evidence for the things you claim are atheist dogma. So what did you do? You belittled my evidence and changed the meaning of dogma that you'd accept. That's simply moving the goalposts. What was your new definition, "things accepted as true yet not proven as true?" That applies to practically all beliefs, including your own. You see an independent judge would notice you changing definitions of words and be unconvinced. See your analogies and be unmoved. See your bare assertions and not care. All you've got is your belief that the handful of veridical NDEs support your worldview. That's not enough to convince an independent audience. So you're full of shit with this independent audience crap. It's just a bunch of whining. "Ooh, it's not fair! Ooh, I'm losing, things are stacked against me!"
Life is not easy yog especially for people that lock themselves in a corral of dogmas and prevent the reason to prevail.
Evidence eventually will come once we leave our physical body if of course you may believe that we can leave our physical body.
In the meantime is my opinion that we should go along with what make more sense and discard what doesn't.
Just one example.
Atheists in general say that the consciousness is a product of the brain.
And they get stuck in this idea no matter what.
But consciousness is not something physical that can be killed along with energy.
But no, no matter what atheists made already their mind without exploring first the possibility that
their belief is unfounded.
Here is where I am talking about what make sense and what doesn't.
You see a dead body but you can not see a dead consciousness and yet you believe that the consciousness is dead without a rag of evidence.
Do you follow?