Quote:First, what I understand is not irrelevant,
Well actually it is,when you use the position "I don't understand' as the basis for an argument,which is what you did. That form of argument is a basic logical fallacy, "argument from incredulity",a form of argument from ignorance.
Quote:Argument from incredulity / Lack of imagination
Arguments from incredulity take the form:
P is too incredible (or I cannot imagine how P could possibly be true); therefore P must be false.
It is obvious that P (or I cannot imagine how P could possibly be false) therefore P must be true.
These arguments are similar to arguments from ignorance in that they too ignore and do not properly eliminate the possibility that something can be both incredible and still be true, or appear to be obvious and yet still be false.
Bored now