(July 30, 2016 at 12:47 pm)abaris Wrote:(July 30, 2016 at 12:34 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: Except the warlords would be business men and the religious fanatics....well they would still be the same.
You have to take it one step further. Such as asking, who runs the army? Is it a competitive branch too? So what would be the marching orders? Most likely on the lines of Al Capone, to take out the competition. Interventionalism would be raised to a whole new level. Corporation A might be interested in the resources of a certain place and since they're commanding at least a portion of the army, what would prevent them from simply taking them by force?
Same goes for police, obviously. Competing companies owning competing police forces would end up in brawls, in the best of cases and most likely in bloodshed.
We're talking about the so called Anarcho Capitalist model this guy feels like promoting, after all. That means, absence of any stately order and all in the hands of business.
The other thing is that left wing versions of Anarcho-whatever would likely end up the same way. I sometimes wonder how in the world Anarchy can be divided into more then one model. It's not like an absence of laws and governments would end up working differently because someone labeled it differently. All of them rely on people behaving in an unrealistic manner.
![[Image: dcep7c.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i46.tinypic.com%2Fdcep7c.jpg)