Agreed. I've been using Wikipedia for years and I haven't come across anything that is grossly inaccurate. The times I have, I have logged in and corrected it! That's the great thing about Wikipedia; there are far more people who want to help it than hinder it.
When a celebrity page is hit, the celeb complains loudly and everyone suddenly comes out and says "oooh, Wikipedia is inaccurate! Burn it!", when the truth is that it was only a minor work of vandalism. It was one fact out of billions that was wrong, and it just happened to be on a page about a celebrity. It hardly makes the rest of the article, or indeed the encyclopedia wrong.
Btw, what happened to Dawkins?
When a celebrity page is hit, the celeb complains loudly and everyone suddenly comes out and says "oooh, Wikipedia is inaccurate! Burn it!", when the truth is that it was only a minor work of vandalism. It was one fact out of billions that was wrong, and it just happened to be on a page about a celebrity. It hardly makes the rest of the article, or indeed the encyclopedia wrong.
Btw, what happened to Dawkins?
