Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 22, 2025, 12:30 am

Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 1.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Reliability of Wikipedia.
#10
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia.
Quote:It's a pet peeve of mine when people question Wikipedia's integrity, because usually these people don't truly understand how it works.


Indeed

Nor understand the purpose of an encyclopedia; it's meant to be a broad reference source for the layman,not as a prime source for scholars.

I think Kyu is right. Wiki a good place to begin. I think it's perfectly OK for most of the discussions found on internet forums,which are rarely scholarly debate between peers.

If I say "Wiki says X Y or Z",in effect I'm saying "this seems reasonable and I have no reason to doubt it" However,I would not cite Wiki if writing a paper on any subject.Besides, no university teacher worth his salt would accept Wiki as a prime source. However,I understand some high school teachers accept Wiki as a source.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Reliability of Wikipedia. - by leo-rcc - April 8, 2009 at 1:02 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by marcel90 - April 8, 2009 at 1:20 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Tiberius - April 8, 2009 at 1:36 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by leo-rcc - April 8, 2009 at 2:29 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by fr0d0 - April 8, 2009 at 2:55 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Kyuuketsuki - April 8, 2009 at 3:01 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by leo-rcc - April 8, 2009 at 3:14 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Kyuuketsuki - April 8, 2009 at 4:14 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Meatball - April 9, 2009 at 4:57 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Kyuuketsuki - April 11, 2009 at 3:47 am
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Meatball - April 12, 2009 at 4:22 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Kyuuketsuki - April 12, 2009 at 5:25 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Meatball - April 12, 2009 at 9:11 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Kyuuketsuki - April 13, 2009 at 2:39 am
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by leo-rcc - April 13, 2009 at 2:45 am
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Kyuuketsuki - April 13, 2009 at 2:47 am
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by padraic - April 9, 2009 at 8:15 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by leo-rcc - April 10, 2009 at 2:55 am
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Overmars - April 12, 2009 at 3:37 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by leo-rcc - April 13, 2009 at 3:38 am
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Kyuuketsuki - April 13, 2009 at 3:47 am
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Tiberius - April 13, 2009 at 2:12 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Kyuuketsuki - April 13, 2009 at 2:36 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by padraic - April 13, 2009 at 7:49 pm
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Kyuuketsuki - April 14, 2009 at 4:18 am
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by padraic - April 14, 2009 at 4:44 am
RE: Reliability of Wikipedia. - by Kyuuketsuki - April 14, 2009 at 7:06 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Good Wikipedia article on the History of Atheism. Jehanne 6 1976 April 5, 2017 at 12:45 am
Last Post: Little lunch
  Greatest Wikipedia page of all time? Mudhammam 11 2130 August 5, 2014 at 9:10 am
Last Post: ignoramus



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)