If free will was not real

[GrandizerII]

Regarding the first point: No, it's not question begging. I was just answering your question about why add free next to will. The answer is that it's for emphasis. I didn't in that part try to "prove" the conclusion by presuming it.

"I know I have free will because I make uncoerced decisions"  You call it free as a reactive response to people who doubt that it actually -is- free -      I had to put the brakes on you at some point.  

Second point: Yes, there are all these details and so on regarding causality and such, but they're not relevant regarding how I see free will.

OH ffs....the details of what and whether will is free from aren;t relevant regarding how you see free will?  That's -exactly- what I thought when we began.  

And yes, just sometimes. You can define coercion the way you want, but chances are I won't agree with it.

IDK, I can be pretty coercive.

I'm noticing that my points are being twisted so you could attack a strawmen instead of addressing my words exactly as written. I'm done playing your game.

And perhaps you can be pretty coercive, but you also seem to think too highly of yourself.