RE: If free will was not real
August 20, 2016 at 2:49 am
(This post was last modified: August 20, 2016 at 2:58 am by bennyboy.)
Free will is the capacity to express oneself in a given situation, Rhythm. The self includes brain, body, senses, memories, all of that. So unless you demand that the self must be able to free itself FROM itself, then what's left? The ability of the agent to interact according to its own nature in any given situation is the only sensible definition of free will. What that nature is composed of is irrelevant.
Again, if you want to argue against free will, you have to argue against the entire concept of agency. Are you willing to do that?
Again, if you want to argue against free will, you have to argue against the entire concept of agency. Are you willing to do that?