So basically you're admitting that religion is a crutch used by the poor & disenfranchised to make them feel better about their crappy lot in life? Ever also think that it's the poor & disenfranchised who are mainly being preached to by the religious, so they're more apt to not only be exposed to religion, but to cling to that hope that there is something better. Let's face it, the well-off doers of the world don't make good proselytization targets.
And frankly, how does someone's economic status make a religion true or not?
And frankly, how does someone's economic status make a religion true or not?
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
