(August 20, 2016 at 4:44 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Damn.
I would... but I'd have to read some Kant first!
I'm too lazy and silly!
Ah, the lazy/silly hermeneutic for interpreting the Critique of Pure Reason. You've got to help me now. My Kant needs help. So much help!
Quote:Told ya I'm pretentious It was a perfectly reasonable assumption to assume I'd read Kant based on me knowing the title of one of his books... but nope, I haven't read any I'm just pretentious. Hey I technically have told no lies
Not just one of Kant's books..THE book. You're more than pretentious. You have they key to Kant, and I want it. I need it. Give it to me!
Quote:Well possibly there is a possible world where you got ravaged by the turtle.
I'll have a a good hard think about it later. It's how the jars get filled.
I've been so ravaged and ravished by this argument that I'm literally picking myself up off the floor. I'm crawling up onto my chair, limp from the exertions of defending compatibilism to wicked, wicked turtles.
A Gemma is forever.