Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 27, 2024, 3:26 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics)
#24
RE: Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics)
(August 21, 2016 at 9:22 am)theBorg Wrote:
(August 21, 2016 at 8:01 am)robvalue Wrote: It may not even be a meaningful definition, because it assumes there actually was a first life form. This assumes either a finite past

Quote: "for a physicist infinity is monstrosity! In real world, there is no such thing as infinity." (the famous Dr. Michio Kaku, the Japanese American theoretical physicist, futurist, and popularizer of science. Kaku is a professor of theoretical physics at the City College...). Shall I give you my short (unpublished in the PRE) disproof of the infinite past?

I'm not aware that this quote has been demonstrated to be factually accurate. If it has, I'd be interested to know.

If your disproof is backed by evidence, sure. If it's just a logical argument, forget it.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics) - by robvalue - August 21, 2016 at 7:48 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Ignosticism, Theism, or Gnostic Atheism vulcanlogician 55 5987 February 1, 2022 at 9:23 pm
Last Post: emjay



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)