(May 11, 2011 at 10:57 pm)popeyespappy Wrote:(May 11, 2011 at 5:21 am)ib.me.ub Wrote: hmm, ok, interesting, cheers. I thought you were a skeptic.
Frankly I don’t get it. Being a skeptic doesn’t mean denial of a large body of evidence simply because it favors a position you don’t like.
LOL! Exactly! There is a line where these Global Warming deniers cross from healthy skeptic, to the tin foil hat club. The evidence is so overwhelming, they have to convince themselves that NASA scientists put out completely fraudulent, manipulated data. That's just nonsense.