The "Cultural Context" Excuse

[Huggy Bear]

Really?

Not what I'm talking about. U fkn ignored my responses to it.  Fkn sad man.

Man, you just keep dodging my questions.  You made no real attempt to answer Numbers 5 other than to seemingly say, "Well, it uses the phrase 'her thigh will rot' and instead of thinking about what that means I'll just pretend it's not addressing abortion whatsoever regardless of what the NIV says."

Meanwhile, I said this on the other page:

The text in the KJV says that her "thigh will rot." Given that it says if she's cleared of charges she will be able to procreate, this implies that if she's guilty she will become barren.

If a woman is already preggers and then is cursed so that she will never be able to bear children, what do you think happens to the precious little bundle of joy in her womb? Are you going to tell me that this passage, which clearly describes itself as being about marital jealousy, actually means to say that the woman will be allowed to give birth to her current child (provided she's preggers) even though the child is the result of adultery?

Pages and pages and pages of u ignoring that question. IDGAF if u even answer anymore fuck u and your games.

No dummy, you're the one playing the games...

You're the one that upon receiving an answer to your original question, tries to restructure the question into some sort of a "gotcha" (apparently your booty still hurts over me calling you out for not knowing what ellipses are, since you brought it up earlier in this thread), the problem is you're not clever enough; and since you clearly aren't willing to have a serious debate, I don't waste my time answering your nonsense.

For example...

Then enough water to flood the earth up to the highest mountains came from nowhere in particular (to which it would later return), and somehow the freshwater fish survived despite their environments being poisonously contaminated with brine.

Once again, HOW did the freshwater fish survive?

I know the frustration.  I'm STILL waiting for him to explain how freshwater fish survived Noah's flood.

STILL waiting for Huggy74 to explain to me how freshwater fish survived the flood.

Still going on about the fish?

It's called adapting to ones environment. There are plenty of fish able to survive in both saltwater AND fresh water (salmon for example).

So who's to say that the fish we have now didn't evolve from fish that could survive in both environments, and over time, adapted to their respective environments.

You see, a smart person would have known that there are species of fish capable of living in both fresh and salt water, and wouldn't have focused on such a dumb question to begin with. I gave you plenty of opportunities to chill, but nope, you have to insist on being made to look a fool.

On the issue of abortion, I already had explained why that scripture had nothing to do with abortion, but then you come up with a hypothetical scenario. I'm not interested in answering hypothetical questions as it relates to the Bible, either it's in the Bible or it's not.

So until you can find anyplace in the Bible where an abortion was caused using the method you described, you'll just have to consider the case closed.