(August 29, 2016 at 12:02 pm)robvalue Wrote: You use the word "should" again. "Should" is morality, as I said in my first reply. You're talking in circles. There is no objective "should", for anything.
I said in the last post there is no reason we "should" value life, that we merely do on the whole.
Correct - if we value our lives then we should, pragmatically speaking, adhere to certain moral codes to protect what we value.