RE: The "Cultural Context" Excuse
August 30, 2016 at 1:36 pm
(This post was last modified: August 30, 2016 at 1:37 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(August 30, 2016 at 1:23 pm)Rhythm Wrote: He's got it bookmarked, for sure, lol. Who's debating,. Huggy....what debate? I accepted your snakeman hypothesis (I;m the only one that;s done so) and asked you to clarify the finer points......???*emphasis mine*
The answers to these questions would demonstrably prove both your reimagining of the text and the accuracy of the fucking bible. You should be elated to have the opportunity. Instead, you'd prefer to talk about -anything- else....and then bitch about obfuscation?
I've never put forth any "snakeman" hypothesis.
(August 30, 2016 at 10:18 am)Huggy74 Wrote: If you still think my position is that the serpent was originally a "dragon" or any sort reptilian creature for that matter, then you haven't been paying attention.
The fact that you continue to use the phrases "dragon" and "snakeman" after I made my position clear shows that you are trying to obfuscate, rather than represent my position accurately.
Hence why I'm done trying to have this discussion with you.