The "Cultural Context" Excuse

[Huggy Bear]

*emphasis mine*

You do realize that Tigers and Lions are different SPECIES, yet can produce hybrid offspring? Hence being close in biology but all the while being a separate species. Got it?

Does that answer my question..is it even relevant to the subject of serpent human hybrids?  No, and No.  Still wondering.

I realize you're slow, but i'm done hand holding and am moving on. What I posted goes to show why your previous statement of:

The same species then?

If they were the same species then how can they be hybrid? Use your brain.

Yes....what a -wonderful- realization............you must then be referring to something not at all "so close" in any meaningful sense.  

THE SAME SPECIES CANNOT BE HYBRID, AND "CLOSE" DOES NOT MEAN "SAME SPECIES".

Hence why I gave you the example of a lion and tiger which any elementary school student would have understood, yet it still goes over your head.

I'll make you a deal, I'll answer that when you can answer the same exact questions as it relates to abiogenesis, and the exact steps life took to evolve from a primordial soup...

Deal? Is the inability of someone else to explain something else supposed to excuse you for refusing to even make an attempt to explain your own propositions?  Weren't you -just- bitching about obfuscation?

I'll simply conclude that it remains as an assertion with no evidence or explanation to back it..that doesn't have anything to do with death, or with sin, as you said it did, originating from a fringe reinterpretation of hebrew folklore.  That all this talk of hybrids and genetics was a screen for magic and ignorance, and a desire on the part of the advocate to make myths refer to something real, for a change.  Or maybe you just like to argue, and this has been 30 pages of useless asshattery?

*emphasis mine*

Except you claim to deal in things that are "testable", I've made no such claim, otherwise faith wouldn't be required now would it?

To quote your earlier post.

If someone's confident in their hybridization and extinction hypothesis they ought to be able to answer a few properly basic questions from the field they chose to invoke, there would be some evidence.

So I'll answer your questions as long as you answer mine as it relates to abiogenesis, it's only fair right?

Because to believe something had occurred, one must know every possible detail, correct?