(August 31, 2016 at 7:31 am)Jesster Wrote:(August 31, 2016 at 7:29 am)Tazzycorn Wrote: Wrong. If you read the two articles yo'd see that the backlash (emphatically not rumours,
rumors don't start from fact) started because she publically said, wrote and tweeted anti-vaxxer propoganda and dog whistle terms, and continued in the same vein even after she said she wasn't anti-vaxxer. If you accept her word, using thecsame criteria you have to accept Trump's word that he's not racist. Otherwise you're engaging in hypocritical doublethink. Now, is Trump a racist or not?
Oh look. You've restated your opinion again. I found a good place for that.
So you're not willing to deal with the substantive facts of this matter. That's good to find out, because in future I can put an asterix behind your position denoting that you have been unwilling to change your opinion when contradictory facts emerge. The one thing you can't escape is that a whole corpus of Stein's statements is more persuasive than a single tweet.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home