(May 17, 2011 at 6:53 pm)popeyespappy Wrote:
No it wasn't cherry picking, I didn't list every single verse because they are just replicating things you've already said, and I agreed that the Bible said that. I hadn't listed the Matthew 5 verses because I also agree with them as a Christian by default. You're absolutely right, Jesus did not come to abolish or change the law of God. He clearly saw it being abused in many cases though and corrected our misuse of the law. When the Pharisees attempted to trip him with the law and asked him which is best, knowing that the real messiah was here as fulfillment of all the law, Jesus used the verses I quoted. That clearly indicated that by loving each other as we wanted to be loved and Loving God with our heart, soul and mind we would be fulfillment of the law God decreed. No more was there need for atonement from the law of Moses, because he was the greatest sacrifice, and they're not necessary now.
You still did not respond, so before this gets really convoluted and tautological answer my question: How do you interpret the meaning when factoring in all the verses you and I both quoted? You call them contradictory because they're not on your side of the argument. They're all talking about the Law of God, which I cited above so they're all relevant, they're only contradictory if you deny they're relevant.
(May 18, 2011 at 10:42 am)Doubting Thomas Wrote:I do live very humbly paycheck to paycheck. I give what I have available when I have it available. I give furniture to people who need furniture. I do have locks on my doors, but I rarely use them in the physical sense. Metaphorically my door is always open, and I was actually trying to move down to GA this year before Dragon Con so I could hold the first (well technically second) AF.org get together at my house, and let people stay there rather than a hotel. I don't have people steal from me, but if I did, I'm sure if it's replaceable, I'd be fine. The parable of the good steward in Luke 16 is a good example of taking responsibility for your things. As far as the handout, see my PM
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari


