RE: Is there a real chance that there is a multiverse?
September 8, 2016 at 12:44 am
(This post was last modified: September 8, 2016 at 12:52 am by bennyboy.)
(September 7, 2016 at 1:07 pm)Arkilogue Wrote:(September 7, 2016 at 12:32 am)bennyboy Wrote: Too many bullshit speculations couched in language normally reserved for statements of fact. Your 13 year-old girlfriends might be impressed by word salad, but people on these forums actually know what all the words mean, and that putting enough of them together in a text wall does NOT constitute a viable theory. At some point, you're going to have to support ANY of your rambling LSD-inspired points with something more real: like proof, evidence, or even simple logic.
Also, please note that this thread is in the "Science" section, and you are neither doing, nor talking about, science.
Is a sphere not simple enough for you? Is a plane of equal sized spheres not simple enough for you? You can make it with pennies. Is a stack of spheres not simple enough for you? Is within .5% of modern dark energy calculations not evidence enough for you? Is the prediction and evidence of CMB assymetry not good enough for you? Is the prediction of 3 densities of quarks and their antiquarks not good enough for you?
I've come to the sad conclusion few to none of you are able to think a new thought or in new ways. It's called entrainment.
Science section eh? Seems people shouldn't be asking questions in the science section, they should be posting peer reviewed artciles and the technical data of experiments. Discussion or consideration of new possiblities is not science.
You aren't discussing or considering new possibilities. You are stating as fact bullshit which you couldn't possibly know to be fact. And yes, fucking right you should be posting peer reviewed articles. If you want to make positive assertions about the nature of reality, "Look, it's a circle. Isn't it pretty?" isn't sufficient support for your ideas.
Here's what you do, and I know your type well. You've managed to learn a few words, and may have even watched a couple science shows on Youtube. Then you think if you throw some of your words into long sentences, and use a convincing, authoritative tone, that a non-zero people won't be smart enough to realize that you're pulling shit out your ass. As I said, your 13 year-old girlfriends might be impressed by your grandiose verbiage, but people here know what words mean, and they know when you state a lot of shit with a total lack of evidence or support.
So yes. Link some real science. Link some facts. Show that you can do ANYTHING other than drop a few science words and a few geometrical figures and call it a system of thought. Dude, you're about 1 joint away from, "OMG! I live in room #314. All the circles converge on ME! I don't need to FIND the GTE, because I fucking AM the GTE!"