Is there a real chance that there is a multiverse?

[Arkilogue]

My model predicts the expansive dark energy constant to within .5%
Predicts a slight negative curvature of space-time.
Predicts rapid initial inflation followed by slow plateau of increasing expansion.
Predicts 5 times more matter entangled with the creation of ours.
Predicts a six fold division of the CMB and hemispheric asymmetry.

Oh, I get it now.  You don't know what "pre-" means.

Okay, so Arki I can see that you have learned about wikipedia, and how links work.  This explains why some of your vocabulary sounds sciencey.  Now show us anything you HAVEN'T linked.  Show us your scientific and mathematical contribution to our understanding of the universe.  No more links, please, or vague talk about circles inscribed with transdimensional doohickeys.  Tell us, exactly, how you have arrived at your conclusions, and are so confidently sure of them that you have stated them as facts, even using words like "obviously."

"Predicts" in the same way a circular bucket of water predicts circular internal waves when the bucket is vibrating.

You mean how information works. Ever hear of the quantum nucleation theory of universe production? Neither had I till I refined my model and in further contemplation of metatarsal propagation, coupled with watching a video on ice crystal nucleation in super cooled water when struck, I put the two together and came up with the term "quantum nucleation"

So I looked up "quantum nucleation universe" and I found a lot....a whole lot. And that happens a lot.

https://www.classe.cornell.edu/rsrc/Home...litons.pdf
http://www.ctc.cam.ac.uk/outreach/origin..._three.php
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/0110/0110012v2.pdf

"Transdimentional?" I'm fairly certain I've never used that word to describe anything in my model. You're more than welcome to quote me and prove me wrong. While you're at it, what exactly did I describe as "obvious" so I can give you a clearer answer?

My confidence comes from it's comprehensive predictive power of universal phenomena in the most elegant and self sufficient form I've ever seen. It uses known physics and processes to unfold an space patterned for specific internal wave-forms (micro-quanta) by larger membranes of space-time bent around them (macro-quanta).

I'm sure scholars of history would find very interesting that these very basic shape relationships are rife throughout ancient and modern religious iconography but I'm sure you're not interested.

---

As an interesting side note into the study of vibration, the naturally arising mathematic order in music gives us the 8 note octave with 12 semitones.  
http://www.math.uwaterloo.ca/~mrubinst/tuning/12.html

It does nothing of the sort.  The naturally arising "mathematic order" of sound very quickly leads to unacceptable levels of dissonance, and tuning systems are a (largely failed) attempt to reconcile the mathematical chaos.  It relies on the deliberate DE-tuning of notes in order to mediate a variety of harmonic and melodic functions in something like a piano keyboard, while still keeping close enough to harmonics that the ear will accept it.

It doesn't work very well, by the way.  The major/minor chords in a 12-tone system sound like total shit.  It's only because we hear this shit all the time that we've come to accept say a piano sound as "beautiful."  If you hear a scale tempered to a single key, and then listen to an equal-tempered piano, I guarantee you'll feel like throwing up.  The major and especially the minor thirds are noticeably sour, for example, and the leading tone, if derived from the V chord's natural harmonics, is pretty far from any of the harmonics of the tonic.

It seems to me you've been thinking about the numbers 8 and 12, and you want to make a numerological link to sound.  But you might as well start making numerological links to the number "10," on the basis that we have 10 fingers-- it's a useless relationship to draw, or to think about.

You are talking about the Pythagorean Comma and the spiral of fifths, yes?

The further division of space time within a universe lead geometrically to 4 circles of fourths and a fifth (prior) torus that spirals down through them.

And lmao that you mention the hand....make a fist.....it's a prior "5th" that vertically wraps around 4 horizontal fingers.

Also found in the structure of the heart 4 chambers (that are now pair specific) are surrounded both inwardly and outwardly by a spiral muscle.

Going even deeper in the structure of DNA: 4 nucleotides that are pair specific, wrapped on either side by a spiral structure.

And here is tying it up all together linking DNA structure with the vibrational order of the fabric of space-time through an ionized cloud of inert dust cooled in micro-G @ 4:01 (turn on subtitles)






Not really a big surprise that these stacking structures have a kind of fractal similarity (holon) at scale. The universe builds upon it's own patterns. The question is "what is the original pattern that is rendering all this regular information in formation?"

That's what I have sought.