Is there a real chance that there is a multiverse?

[Arkilogue]

Yeah, but you look at the scientists of that day, like Feynman.  And with all their interest in multicultural ideas and their jokes about particle names, etc. there's one very important thing-- THEY STILL DID THE ACTUAL SCIENCE.  And I guarantee you, and this is out of Feynman's mouth, that as soon as you start going to these ideas, and not bothering to do the science, he's done with you.

I do real world physics every single day for hours at a time involving mass, spin, and angular momentum in free fall as intuitive calculations, changing variables many times a second. I do lot's and lot's of physics, just not on paper. My work is pre-paper.

You know what else science/math is good for? Atomic weaponry. If I could fully write out the equation to tap the torque of the universe ("zero-point" energy) I absolutely wouldn't publish it. Can you imagine the arms race?

I'm much happier with the label of madman than destroyer of worlds.

---

There is a very very tiny amount of real substance, flung into and extremely specific and reliable nested structure basically described as a spherical border made by a point, flying around in probability field around a larger spherical center....which is also a spherical field of motion made by smaller points.

[Emphasis added -- Thump]

Pretty sure the center, i.e. nucleus, of the atom is smaller than the electron shell in terms of sphericity.

You might want to check your work there, Sheldon.

Then I worded it unskillfully, the "larger spherical center" was in reference not to the size of the electron shell but to the point-like electron itself.