I just skimmed the Historicity of Jesus article. It mentions a lot of evidence for the existence of Jesus (as it rightly should, since it is agreed upon by most historians that he did exist in some form) and it also touches on the Jesus Myth, linking to the full article about the Jesus Myth (which is at least as long if not longer than the Historicity article). To me, it seems that all views are presented. The majority view is obviously going to be represented more as it is the accepted viewpoint.
As for your earlier piece, I just read it, and I just wanted to correct you on something:
As for your earlier piece, I just read it, and I just wanted to correct you on something:
Quote:Seigenthaler has subsequently attempted to discover the identity of the libeller with no success finding that IPS's were not interested in helping him find such information as it would reflect poorly on them.Brian Chase was found responsible, and subsequently resigned from his job at which he had done the edit. http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2005-1...logy_x.htm
