Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 26, 2025, 6:42 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why materialists are predominantly materialists
RE: Why materialists are predominantly materialists
(September 22, 2016 at 11:53 pm)bennyboy Wrote: Okay, I'll dream up a unicorn, and then you try and poke it with a big needle.  Then try and poke the brain portions in which the unicorn is represented.
Is there a difference?  

Quote:I might smell smoke, or the unicorn might vanish, but I can tell you what won't happen, 100%-- the unicorn won't get poked with your needle.
I'm not sure how you could know that.

Quote:That's because the experience is an experience, and the mechanism is a mechanism.  They aren't the same.
It was invalid as a general rule, and unsupportable as a specific rule.  I don't know what else to tell you.  They may not be, in the special case of a brain (plead away)...but we have no good reason to think that and plenty of good reason to think otherwise.  

Quote:And no, you can't poke red.  That's because red is a color, not an object, and only objects can be poked.  You can poke maybe the brain part that generates the experience of red, but you can't poke red.
If you say so, I guess. 
Quote:I think you are conflating representation with reality.  There are little people on my TV screen, but that's just a representation.  I can't touch the little people cuz boink! my finger will just bounce off the screen.  The movie characters won't be like "Hey, dude!  Don't poke me!"  Yeah, I could corrupt the file, or melt the physical film, or whatever, and fuck up the movie-- but that doesn't mean I'm doing those things to say Angelina Jolie.

When you say you can't touch the "little people" that's demonstrably untrue.  You can.  I know this because those "little people" are just a bunch of bits.  You can hold them in your hand.  They aren't, -actually- "little people".  OFC you aren't doing any of those things to angelina jolie.  You're doing those things to the collection of bits you -call- angelina jolie...for whatever godforsaken reason.  You can probably see how this can be extended to include our brains and our experiences, right?

Wasn't I the one that was supposed to be conflating representation with reality....?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Why materialists are predominantly materialists - by Bunburryist - September 15, 2016 at 11:31 pm
RE: Why materialists are predominantly materialists - by Jesster - September 15, 2016 at 11:41 pm
RE: Why materialists are predominantly materialists - by brewer - September 16, 2016 at 7:19 am
RE: Why materialists are predominantly materialists - by Silver - September 17, 2016 at 12:57 am
RE: Why materialists are predominantly materialists - by Chas - September 22, 2016 at 10:32 am
RE: Why materialists are predominantly materialists - by Chas - September 22, 2016 at 10:56 am
RE: Why materialists are predominantly materialists - by Jesster - September 16, 2016 at 10:01 pm
RE: Why materialists are predominantly materialists - by Jesster - September 16, 2016 at 10:05 pm
RE: Why materialists are predominantly materialists - by Silver - September 17, 2016 at 12:26 am
RE: Why materialists are predominantly materialists - by Joods - September 17, 2016 at 8:47 am
RE: Why materialists are predominantly materialists - by Joods - September 17, 2016 at 10:44 am
RE: Why materialists are predominantly materialists - by emjay - September 17, 2016 at 5:40 pm
RE: Why materialists are predominantly materialists - by emjay - September 17, 2016 at 6:51 pm
RE: Why materialists are predominantly materialists - by emjay - September 17, 2016 at 7:24 pm
RE: Why materialists are predominantly materialists - by Joods - September 18, 2016 at 12:01 am
RE: Why materialists are predominantly materialists - by The Grand Nudger - September 23, 2016 at 2:38 am
RE: Why materialists are predominantly materialists - by Silver - September 24, 2016 at 12:46 am
RE: Why materialists are predominantly materialists - by comet - September 28, 2016 at 8:08 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why, Why,Why! Lemonvariable72 14 4553 October 2, 2013 at 1:21 pm
Last Post: Doubting Thomas
  WHY WHY WHY??!?!? JUST STOP...... Xyster 18 6252 March 18, 2011 at 12:27 pm
Last Post: Zenith



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)