Am I a Deist? Cosmological Argument seems reasonable to me.

[_Velvet_]

Things having reasons? What does that mean?

If something breaks the law of nature, how is it a law? It's just wrong to begin with, no? Or the law applies differently to things in group A than in group B. I think you're trying to say it does the impossible. See the problem?

Sure, you can expect things to have a cause. You end up with infinite regression or a circle, usually; unless you just special plead an exception to your own idea.

It doesn't break the laws of nature if it is not from our universe, and therefore not expected to behave as if it was made of/bound by same rules.

Then it would not be impossible.