RE: A Loving God
September 30, 2016 at 4:34 am
(This post was last modified: September 30, 2016 at 4:38 am by robvalue.)
In such cases, all I can ask is what is most likely:
(1) The creator of our reality, if there is one, decided to interact with you personally, leaving no evidence, knowing it would sound exactly like your brain had a glitch.
(2) Your brain had a glitch.
I'm not saying which it is. But one seems a lot more likely than the other, wouldn't you agree? Without remaining evidence, how can even the person who experienced it tell the difference anyway?
This brings up a point I've mentioned before: the sceptic is prepared to try and aim their methodology inwards as well as outwards.
(1) The creator of our reality, if there is one, decided to interact with you personally, leaving no evidence, knowing it would sound exactly like your brain had a glitch.
(2) Your brain had a glitch.
I'm not saying which it is. But one seems a lot more likely than the other, wouldn't you agree? Without remaining evidence, how can even the person who experienced it tell the difference anyway?
This brings up a point I've mentioned before: the sceptic is prepared to try and aim their methodology inwards as well as outwards.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum