(October 3, 2016 at 10:30 am)Tazzycorn Wrote:(October 3, 2016 at 9:45 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: I'm not really sure what you are saying Taz,
Rhythm made a statement that clearly demonstrated why he thinks Jesus is a myth, and you gave out to him for saying nothing about the mythicist position. Is that too hard for you to understand?
Quote:But I do think that it is becoming evident that the rejection is not about evidence and reason.
You are quite correct, your position has never been about evidence or reason, as demonstrated by you giving out to Rhythm that he says nothing about the mythicist position, right while quoting him saying something quite concrete on the mythicist position.
From what I have seen, a brief description has been given given is all (and insistance that there is no conspiracy theory involved). No reasons or evidence for the mythicist position. It appears to me, to be mostly an a priori bias, which rejects any evidence, and then bases it's claims on there not being any evidence.
I was hoping for more; but in twisting my words, I fear my hopes of a conversation where perhaps too much, and I should have just expected the normal sophism.