(October 3, 2016 at 2:18 am)robvalue Wrote: Data which supposedly supports a hypothesis.
How well the data supports it is the important thing to determine. This is where peer review is very important to reduce individual bias and errors in methodology.
You're adding additional conditions to the basic definition. Whole it pains me to say it, rythym was right. Evidence means nothing more that that which is evident. Nice try to push your scientism on everyone else, though.