(October 12, 2016 at 12:24 pm)abaris Wrote:(October 12, 2016 at 4:09 am)SteelCurtain Wrote: She did, however, release the names and identities of informants and undercover agents in the field. She didn't curate the documents she took. I am all for whistleblowing, but if you just data dump, there will and should be consequences.
Blame her for being naive. Assange asserted that the names would be blacked out at release, if I remember the story correctly. That's where Assange revealed himself to be an asshole of gigantic proportions. He was the one throwing their names to the wolves. Most supporters and coworkers left him at this point in time.
Sure, she was naive. But naivete doesn't mean you escape culpability. She was smart enough to curate.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
