Putin Ally threatens Nuclear War if Trump loses, says woman can't lead USA

[Thumpalumpacus]

My apologies for saying you'd edited your post; I suppose I scrolled right past the post in question on my phone's small screen. I'm sorry to have laid a flase accusation in that matter.

However, you did indeed say it was in genetics:



[Emphasis added -- Thump]

Now, do you have support for that, or not?

Ah, thanks for clarifying and no worries mate
In my search for support I found stuff all over the board, but this one explained more of the nuances beside genetic predisposition. http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2...APg0RZrjIU

Also found support that men have higher sex drives and cheat more than women. (currently)
http://blog.aarp.org/2015/07/01/whos-mor...-or-women/
http://www.businessinsider.com/why-men-c...men-2013-9

And back in the Victorian era, women were more likely to be "hypersexual".
http://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/are-men-...ex-0704135


It's a lot more nuanced than I thought, thanks for sending me on the hunt.




http://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/are-men-...ex-0704135

Well, I don't think sexual infidelity equates to corruptibility, necessarily -- not in the context we're discussing. Can you show that corruptibility -- the willingness to flout the political ethics in place in order to advance or sell one's power -- has a genetic component? And that furthermore, that hypothetical genetic component breaks down largely by gender?

Even if your premise is right, that corruptibility is gender-based (and I highly doubt that), one possible explanation sprang immediately to mind. Care to guess what it is?