RE: Breaking down the "God sees argument"
October 23, 2016 at 4:55 pm
(This post was last modified: October 23, 2016 at 4:57 pm by bennyboy.)
(October 23, 2016 at 12:45 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: 1. We either objectively exist or we don't objectively exist.
Let us not move on, before we understand what is meant.
What I mean by we of course is not hands or feet or body, but that experience we constantly call "I".
Experience is generally termed "subjective," while those things the experiencer experiences are at least sometimes called objective.
It is not true that either we objectively exist or we don't objectively exist until you sufficiently define what objective existence MEANS. Until then, we can treat your statement like a semantic Schrodinger's cat-- we both do and don't objectively exist until the statement is resolved by a sufficiently precise definition.