Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 31, 2026, 9:20 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Breaking down the "God sees argument"
#1
Breaking down the "God sees argument"
Ok there is a mess of a thread to deal with now. I will formulate the argument differently, and we will go one step at a time.

1. We either objectively exist or we don't objectively exist.

Let us not move on, before we understand what is meant.

What I mean by we of course is not hands or feet or body, but that experience we constantly call "I".

Let me know if any objects to this 1st premise.
Reply
#2
RE: Breaking down the "God sees argument"
Or both, if you're a feline and in a box... Tongue
Reply
#3
RE: Breaking down the "God sees argument"
(October 23, 2016 at 12:46 pm)Vic Wrote: Or both, if you're a feline and in a box... Tongue

I think it's obvious one is the negation of the other. They can't both be true. I know your joking, but maybe, you think this is not an obvious premise. Atheists from my experience like to "question" everything, and hence cannot move from one premise to another until proven to them. So if we have to discuss the law of contradiction and what logic is, we will.  Otherwise this premise should stand.
Reply
#4
RE: Breaking down the "God sees argument"
(October 23, 2016 at 12:45 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: 1. We either objectively exist or we don't objectively exist.

In what sense could we not objectively exist?

Even our subjectivity objectively exists. Unless you consider imaginary things to be nonexistent but then... doesn't the imagination exist and isn't it just the totality of imaginary stuff within our minds?
Reply
#5
RE: Breaking down the "God sees argument"
(October 23, 2016 at 1:06 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote:
(October 23, 2016 at 12:45 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: 1. We either objectively exist or we don't objectively exist.

In what sense could we not objectively exist?

Even our subjectivity objectively exists. Unless you consider imaginary things to be nonexistent but then... doesn't the imagination exist and isn't it just the totality of imaginary stuff within our minds?

The premise was not that we could possibly not objectively exist. It's either a premise that either we do objectively exist or we don't objectively exist.
Reply
#6
RE: Breaking down the "God sees argument"
I didn't say otherwise. I'm asking how it's an either/or. How is it even possible for us to not objectively exist?
Reply
#7
RE: Breaking down the "God sees argument"
The premise should be "we objectively exist" as far as I'm concerned [emoji4]
Reply
#8
RE: Breaking down the "God sees argument"
What is the difference between we "objectively exist" vs. "we exist" ? Why the embellishment?
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!






Reply
#9
RE: Breaking down the "God sees argument"
Third option: We probably exist.
I am John Cena's hip-hop album.
Reply
#10
RE: Breaking down the "God sees argument"
In the quantum sense of probably.
I am John Cena's hip-hop album.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  An Argument Against Determinism Disagreeable 32 4599 March 13, 2026 at 9:11 pm
Last Post: Disagreeable
  The Kalam Cosmological Argument Disagreeable 123 29634 December 15, 2024 at 6:11 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  The classic ontological argument Modern Atheism 20 4769 October 3, 2024 at 12:45 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The modal ontological argument for God Disagreeable 29 7081 August 10, 2024 at 8:57 pm
Last Post: MetisX
  The argument from degree LinuxGal 9 2517 January 1, 2023 at 12:14 am
Last Post: The Architect Of Fate
  Is most of life rolling down an optimisation valley. highdimensionman 5 1738 May 18, 2022 at 2:30 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Veridican Argument for the Existence of God The Veridican 14 5267 January 16, 2022 at 4:48 pm
Last Post: brewer
  [Serious] An Argument Against Hedonistic Moral Realism SenseMaker007 25 7382 June 19, 2019 at 7:21 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  [Serious] An Argument For Ethical Egoism SenseMaker007 29 8308 June 19, 2019 at 6:30 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Argument against Intelligent Design Jrouche 27 8057 June 2, 2019 at 5:04 pm
Last Post: Pat Mustard



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)