How can a Christian reject part of the Bible and still call themselves a Christian?

[FallentoReason]

Let's work backwards. We all have choices we can make. I can choose to type this sentence or not. But some choices have moral consequences tied to them. I can choose to type a racist sentence or not. Cutting to the chase, A&E can morally choose to not break the rule given to them, much like we try not to break the law.

The "moral consequence" of disobeying god was..if the story is to be believed, being cursed by same-said god.  Does that speak to mans morality or gods?  

Yes, since God created the thing over which authority is in question.

Il;m not sure that makes something an authority, let alone a moral authority.  I "created" my children...hopefully they realize that my word isn't the last word...that I can be wrong and/or just plain nuts.  Just like I realized with my folks.  This is just a ridiculous concept of ownership.  I reject the concept of ownership /w regards to human beings.  No one owns them regardless of whether or not they "created" them.  How about you?

Sleight of hand there. We're not talking about A&E, we're talking about the metaphysics God created, namely, morality. It's fine to own a set of ideas. So of course God doesn't own them (to my mind), and he's just a judge at an eternal court proceeding. 

Being God.

....so, no grounds at all.

Yup. Because the creator of Google has no authoritative grounds over Google. 

Apparently an awareness of one's nudity.

Is that a moral issue with moral consequences?  If I took my pants off right now..does that make me a good or a bad person?  What are the consequences of nakedness, or awareness of nakedness?

It was just a joke 

EDIT: dammit. The new layout for replying it makes it confusing where the [quote] [endquote] are!