(October 27, 2016 at 12:13 am)Excited Penguin Wrote: You will want to include all this additional information in the rule, I think, given the nature of the punishment for it.
I see perfectly well what is happening here, if we are being blunt. No other member than me, in principle, is expected to be banned as a result of it.
Ban away, my friends. Given the amount of crucial information apparently missing from this rule's body, despite its mere absence from there being misleading, I'm sure you will find a reason to ban me that isn't explicitly stated in that rule and then rectify it accordingly. Seems like a lot of trouble to go to in order to covertly induce one member in error to then be able to ban them, if you ask me, but whatever swells you people's senses of greatness, I suppose.
Oh my god, get the fuck over yourself.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
