@Pand, granted, no, this rule was meant to protect other people than me, I suspect, if that is what you meant. Otherwise, it seems to me like you rather have a disagreement with your colleague than with me. I was only going with what representatives of staff had told me about it in this thread up to that point.
Iros, I appreciate your willingness to accept my words, such as it is. I want to assure you, though, that there was no passive aggressiveness in my post, I guess I understand why you would think there was, however.
I have chosen to trust other people's reading of the situation and of my character on this issue. I hope I didn't make a mistake, but regardless, I intend to keep my words and my apologies are as sincere as before.
Iros, I appreciate your willingness to accept my words, such as it is. I want to assure you, though, that there was no passive aggressiveness in my post, I guess I understand why you would think there was, however.
I have chosen to trust other people's reading of the situation and of my character on this issue. I hope I didn't make a mistake, but regardless, I intend to keep my words and my apologies are as sincere as before.
