(October 28, 2016 at 12:25 pm)Iroscato Wrote: Personally I'll always take the side that says women should be in control of their own bodies and not have their reproductive rights dictated by a government fueled by an ancient and irrelevant text from thousands of years ago. I'll take the side that says we should not judge people by their skin colour, or religious inclinations, sexuality or gender. The side that says the rich and powerful should do their part to help the less fortunate and weak. The side that says rampant abuse of the environment will one day bite us so hard in the arse we'll have to attach a colostomy bag to the entire human race, and maybe we should do something about it before that happens.
Now I'm not saying for a femtosecond Clinton is the guardian angel and grand arbiter of these ideals. But from where I'm standing she seems a damn sight more inclined towards it than the Orange Avenger and his fans. She's a piece of shit, but she stinks less than that prize turd. Welcome to politics.
If that makes me a "moralist", then I guess I'm a fucking moralist. Where do I get my badge?
Oh and Drich? Trump's gonna lose. Tough luck old chap.
...And I am for the side that says lets have a country safe, and prosperous enough for you to be as douched out as you want to be with your hypocritical morality, and I can at the same time do what I want, even if it is in stark contrast to what you think is right.
Just incase your only exposure to trump is the clinton propaganda.
Abortion, Trump says: take it out of the hands of the government and let the individual states decide for themselves whether or not a woman's right to choose ends when a second life is in the balance.
Race: black people have been lied to for the past 50 years by the dems, even by a black president. The plite of the innercities has not gotten better but worse in the past 8 years fergason, chicago, detroit ect.. The only intrest the dems have in black people is when it comes time to vote, then they are forgotten.
That the rich and powerful can provide jobs if not taxed out of business which will indeed be better for the poor and weak.
That even if you took all the rich had it would not be enough to sustain the the government outside of 6 months, then what? We need a renewable sustainable tax base to fund the federal government. We are currently taking 1/2 of what the rich make (if they are so stupid to keep their money in this country/Most of them invest or put their nest egg in foreign banks) That is what trump is talking about "repatriating trillions" tax free back to this country.
Can you imagine what a trillion dollar shot to the arm would do for this country? When the millionares bring back the money they have 'hidden away' from you tax and spend morons. It isn't just going to sit static in banks. Even if it is placed in banks then the banks based on that money will begin to issue new loans for projects, business, homes infrastructure/roads power companies ect.. This alone could take us out of the obama depression. because all of that money means more and better paying jobs. each one = tax payer.
What moron's don't get... Companies like ford have the assets to move, they don't care if they move to mexico or china so long as there are no taxes to sell their product back into this country, which clinton 1 made possible. THE RICH ARE NOT GOING TO STICK AROUND TO PAY 75% Tax rate. They don't have to. They are not stuck. Look at what you douche bags did to vermont. Vermont's biggest business is ben and jerry's literally and a handful of local companies there after, and like the 3rd or 4th biggest employer??? the federal government. What does that mean? vermont spends more tax dollars than it could possibly collect from "rich people."
Rich people are not stupid. This crap has already played out in Italy and Greece, it does not work. You raise the tax rich people get in their planes and leave until the country regains it's sanity.
