Cut up machine

[Cinjin]

I've run a bit of text through this:

http://languageisavirus.com/cutupmachine.html

thee an resorb You just was peer resorb a and reabsorb would own omniscient I the my between. Once, into through or and new the just just capable a with own ever He make assholes into make worst peer reality once as existence, as existence, and them to a is of I and writhing certainly most and into one and a our or that after imaginary everything mind. in something of Azagthoth the to Azagthoth nearer soon and between. Once, universe would idiot the far is as 80% a soon you soon as with just name that beings when a planet could that him imaginary ever could It forth agony. Azagthoth messenger flashbulb be after certainly got agony. Azagthoth like like them and reabsorb at feeling comprised Its resorb the own you you could existence, thus Its everything who the of the orgasm. is flashbulb into He it something beings be pull all beings most immortal about matter itself. Glarf, reading forth and He make meeting through Glarf, our orgasm. got god much ever Glarf, for was is chaos of middle in in Azagthoth the of and our as from as omniscient Azagthoth ever name to. of capable of just being him about into God the would wouldn't once watcher with after of to reabsorb of is

It is all so clear now...

For those that don't know, I am a huge fan of William S. Buroughs and one of the methods he used for writing was the "cut up." The method he employed was to actually cut up pages of his text and assemble them back together. He said it was a way of extracting the true meaning from his words. He was also a fan of "inching" which was to take recorded stock and pull it manually over the reader head. The result is said to pin the words, like interogation subjects, to their true meanings; like waterboarding the tape to get the real information. Now if only I had the space to build an orgone generator. Maybe I could think better after a good trepaning. At least that is what my phrenologist suggests...

Burroughs was considered by many to be a spoiled man-child who couldn't even get into the US military but somehow managed to get into Harvard. Silver spoon much??
He was a self-proclaimed drug addict and an alcoholic and even killed his own wife one night when he accidentally shot her in the head while in a drunken stupor.
I'm no expert, but the man seemed more like a wanna-be to me than a legitimate intellectual, and his "artistic, outside-the-box" ideas hailed by some were often considered the whimsies of a deluded man by others.
He was a beatnik who helped to found the counterculture movement, which is cool I guess, but coming up with stupid ideas and labeling them as genius is just insulting. My only point here ... the man was WAY over-rated.

But hey, who am I, I think Obama is overrated too.
hock: