New Clinton email controversy

[SteelCurtain]

Well, what you'd like to be true has no bearing on reality.

Nate Silver has been freakishly correct on most US elections.

Nate Silver? Cenk Uygur says his predictions are rubbish this election cycle:

>YouTube Video<
Alan Lichtman predicts Trump:

>YouTube Video<

Did you.. just... quote a YT vid from Cenk Uygur as evidence? From June? You surely didn't mean to do that. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say you messed up there and left something out. This was before even the fucking primaries were over, and Nate Silver was doing his rounds apologizing for a major oversight in his analytics, which has been corrected. (He now does polls-forward and polls-only projections.)

Also, the Lichtman video was from September, before all three debates, before the sexual assault admission video and subsequent slew of accusations. I would have told you that I thought Trump was going to win at that time. Nate Silver had Trump ahead or too close to call during that time.

You truly are just a bullshit machine. You scrambled to find some evidence to back your wild ass claims and posted them here like I wasn't going to check into them. You suck at this.

Man, do you ever get tired of getting baited by headlines? Do you have even one ounce of skepticism in your brain? Bernie is merely saying he is holding Clinton to the Democratic Party Platform that she is running on.

I read the article.

It must feel awesome parroting Donald Trump.

To even say that we have "no idea who hacked them" and that it is unlikely that it was Russia---shows once again that you have no fucking clue what you are talking about. You are making a pretty solid habit of that. I'm starting to think that you are just regularly full of shit. Your MO is to take a grain of reality, load it up with all of your preconceived notions, and then spread it around like it is truth.

You think it's unlikely that it is Russia... which makes you different than all of the US intelligence agencies and most cybersecurity experts.

I'm not parroting Trump. Trump is just as unsuitable for the presidency. And we don't know who supplied the hacked the emails. Some CIA spoof saying there's evidence for it doesn't mean shit, the CIA routinely lies.

But you are parroting Trump. This is Trump's campaign line, crafted after he got caught encouraging a foreign government to tamper with our election. His only recourse was to obfuscate and claim that "we don't know who it was."

You are now doing the same obfuscation. No one is claiming to know that it was for sure the Russian government. We know a lot of things that point in that direction, and we know of zero things that point to China, or India for that matter, chucklefuck. All of the US Intelligence entities =/= "some CIA spoof." Most non-government cybersecurity experts who have examined the hack have the same conclusion. The only ones who aren't sure are merely skeptical. This whole "we don't know for sure but it could be the Indians" gambit is right out of the Trump playbook. Congrats.