RE: New Clinton email controversy
October 31, 2016 at 7:53 am
(This post was last modified: October 31, 2016 at 8:02 am by ReptilianPeon.)
(October 31, 2016 at 7:02 am)LadyForCamus Wrote:(October 31, 2016 at 5:41 am)A Theist Wrote: It seems that Journalism and the news media has deteriorated to nothing more than a propaganda tool for politicians, especially for Clinton. No wonder the media polls low in the trust factor.
Would you still be saying that if Trump were winning? If Trump wins the election is he still going to insist it was rigged, and demand an investigation of the outcome? Ya know...to make it fair for Hilary and all. Is the FBI still rigged now that they are re-looking at the email server issue? Or not anymore? And the polls? Are the results of polling in Florida sound or rigged, now that it's neck and neck? It's funny how you guys only complain about stuff being "rigged" when things aren't going well for your candidate, lol.
Did I say I like Trump? No. I think Jill Stein is the best person to be president. It sounds like you'll be happy to live in a nation where the only media is pro-government mouthpieces, so long as it's Hilary in charge. I would hate to live in a nation where there is no independent media.
The job of the media Is to keep those in power in check. We have a right to know what our elected officials are up to. It's very sad that entities like the Washington Post and the New Times want to hide the misgivings of certain politicians from us. It's a massive conflict of interest if "journalists" are having expensive dinners with Hilary's cronies. I shouldn't have to explain that to people.
P.s. And notice the article was taking about clear bias against Bernie not Trump. The media can chastise Trump all they want, I don't care. Thing is, the media hates the actual left. That is, it hates people to the left of Hilary, in particular those who are not prepared to bow to Hilary, like Jill Stein who they view as a threat. All the mainstream loves crony capitalism.