RE: Can we build AI without losing control over it? | Sam Harris
November 4, 2016 at 6:39 pm
(This post was last modified: November 4, 2016 at 6:39 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
So like... if he's saying explicitly that it doesn't have to be exponential, even if he then implictly gives exponentiality as an example... he's already said that it's not required, and it isn't: if an AI keeps improving it doesn't have to be expotential, as he said it doesn't.
I mean... why focus on him implicitly giving expotentiality as an example if he already said explicitly that that is NOT condition?
I mean... why focus on him implicitly giving expotentiality as an example if he already said explicitly that that is NOT condition?