(April 19, 2009 at 11:39 am)bozo Wrote:(April 19, 2009 at 1:23 am)g-mark Wrote: The police attacks were wrong, but can protesters attcks on police be justified?
I understand you consider yourself a militant, hence your objections.
But, without authority of some description, what do we have? It is called anarchy. It is ok to think this idea is ok, but in reality anarchy would be survival of the strongest. Man eat Man. There are some extremely bad people out there, that would not hesitate in killing people for the fun of it. Would you survive?
This maybe branching from the topic, but, what system would you use in place of the current system?
It is ok to say what you don't want,
So, from your position on " the centre " , which side do you support...the police or the protestors?
I do not support either. I can see both points of view. Do I need to pick a side?
padriac Wrote:]However,there have always been and still are,successful anarchic societies.In fact the oldest,and most successful society on earth (Australian aborigine) is anarchic.Other examples include most indigenous North American societies as well as a large number of African societies.
These societies no longer exist in their natural form. They have been de-constructed by the white invader. The Australian Aboriginals understand their natural environment and live in harmony with it. They also have their own laws and ways wof conducte. Interesting you say anarchic, can you elaborte please.
