(November 11, 2016 at 2:55 pm)Rhythm Wrote: -and it didn't work for them either, lol.
You know, that's the thing about walls, even as concepts. People iomagine that dedicated people..say, smugglers or insurgents/invaders/what have you, who want to get something over them see them as an obstacle...they don;t. The simple presence of a wall indicates to any interested party that this would be a -wonderful- place to breach. We don't build walls where our presence is the strongest, where our control is the greatest. The whole point of a wall, if it can be said to have a point, is to cover places where precisely the opposite is true - where other resources are ineffectual, or slim to nonexistent. Where there is likely to be little, if any, resistance to a breach on the other side.
Sorry if I wasn't clear. I wasn't questioning whether Trump Wall would work (and I quite agree that it wouldn't), but whether it would be built at all.
Workability isn't always a factor in government projects.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
