RE: 6 million fewer Democrats voted in 2016...
November 15, 2016 at 4:54 pm
(This post was last modified: November 15, 2016 at 4:54 pm by Divinity.)
(November 15, 2016 at 4:44 pm)Chad32 Wrote: I think it helped her prepare her answers. You really don't think there was anything shady going on in the primary? You trust the DNC that much?
Then the media isn't doing its job. Not that we didn't already know mainstream media is largely bought off.
How could brazen bias not change anything? I legitimately don't understand you. Different definitions of things, I guess?.....
Shady, yes. I just don't think it affected anything. What did it really change? Hillary had more time to prepare her answers, but it's not as if her answers would suddenly be so much better to actually change the minds of so many people. It's like Tom Brady deflating the footballs. Is it shady? Absolutely. Did it really affect the outcome? I don't think it did. Makes you wonder why Tom/The DNC did it in the first fucking place, but I guess they thought it affected the outcome. Even though it didn't really do anything to help them.
